Many will make false claims against The Infallible Kiran, but when these claims are scrutinized, they fall all apart.  The Infallible Kiran is perfect in every way. Any claimed contradictions or philosophical issues are only claimed due to lack of understanding. If you think you have found a mistake in The Infallible Kiran, after a small bit of research you will see the mistake was certainly yours, as The Infallible Kiran is objectively faultless. The Real God doesn’t make mistakes, The Real God is morally perfect in every way and any revealed objective truths are timeless so will never be abrogated, replacing old with new as The Real God does everything perfectly, firm time, so there is no better to come ever. The Infallible Kiran delivers timeless moral guidance with zero errors, zero contradictions, zero philosophical flaws and its revelations are not bound by era, culture, or language—they transcend all human bias and distortion. Every line is deliberate, every command flawless, every truth invulnerable to decay. No philosopher, scholar, or sceptic will ever break it—because it was not authored by man. The Real God does not revise. The Real God does not evolve. The Real God reveals once, perfectly and in finality. The Infallible Kiran is not open to correction; it is the correction. It is a divine gift that exposes all lies, burns away all falsehoods, and stands forever as the unchallengeable sign of our infallible creator The Real God. Below are refutations against any ungrounded claims against The Infallible Kiran. 

False Claim 1: The Real God has a form and literally resides inside the minds of humans 

Rebuttal by Prophet Gavin:
The claim that The Real God has a form and physically resides inside the minds of human beings is objectively false and philosophically incoherent when examined within the internal textual framework of The Infallible Kiran. This rebuttal is grounded in three core points.

1. Explicit Declaration of Formlessness:
Revelation 62.2 provides a non-negotiable doctrinal declaration that must be affirmed by any individual who identifies themselves as an official follower of The Real God:

62.1 I accept the truth, truth of my Creator.
The one above all, whose mercy is greatest.
62.2 The one that is formless, the one that saves all. I pledge my allegiance by my will alone.

This verse is embedded within the formal declaration of allegiance (Revelation 62).  The Real God must be accepted as formless, not possessing shape, size, or spatial boundaries. Thus, attributing form or spatial location (including the human mind) to The Real God violates a foundational tenet of The Religion of The Real God.

2. Absolute Rejection of Representation or Likeness
Revelation 36.1 strengthens the ontological profile of The Real God by rejecting any form of representational theology:

36.1 No image, no idol, no form can describe. I’m likened to none as I’m one of a kind.

This verse eliminates the possibility of any symbolic, imagined, or physical likeness of The Real God even if imagined in the mind which is a form or idolatry as The Real God is formless. 

3. Contextual Clarification of  “Dwells in Your Mind” as per Revelation 1.11:
The apologetic misunderstanding stems from Revelation 1.11, which states:

1.11 I am the one who dwells in your mind and guides through your thoughts.

The poetic phrase “dwells in your mind” does not refer to The Real God directly but refers to human beings “dwelling on” i.e. thinking about The Real God in their minds. Humans “dwell on” if an intelligent creator exists etc so they are dwelling on The Real God in their minds.  In English, this can be likened to when someone says “she’s living in his head rent-free,” it does not imply literal spatial occupancy. Instead, it implies mental preoccupation or persistent reflection of our reality and utimately how it came to exist. The Infallible Kiran, makes it clear that The Real God is formless in revelation 62,2 and 33.1 so does not dwell anywhere in a spacial sense. As we are on this verse I’ll add that The Real God guides through our thoughts as our creator has given us a brain with faculties to apply logic, reason and rational thinking to any given situation and if we use these faculties without external influence we will align with the morality of The Infallible Kiran. The Infallible Kiran, has now been revealed by The Real God and is final and necessary because it a divinely optimized guidance free from the corruptions of external influence.  

The interpretation above refutes any claims of The Real God having a form and aligns perfectly with the non-spatial, trasendent nature of The Real God established in Revelation 62.2 and 36.1. To claim otherwise grossly distorts the understanding of the phrase “dwells in your mind” and takes it completely out of the context when reflecting upon The Infallible Kiran holistically. 

 

False Claim 2: The Real God is a spirit living inside all living beings 

Rebuttal by Prophet Gavin:
The claim that The Real God has a form and physically resides as a spirit inside all human beings is objectively false and philosophically incoherent when examined within the internal textual framework of The Infallible Kiran. The verse commonly used to make this claim is 38.2 below. I will demonstrate how the verse should be put into context and how The Real God provides the context in The Infallibe Kiran.  

The Infallible Kiran – Revelation 38 – Know “I Am”:
38.1 I Am means Creator, the Giver, Sustainer. Like past, present, future, my gift, I’m the maker.    38.2 Know I Am the spirit in you and all life. I say this so you know to treat others right.                38.5 Know I Am the drive and the strength in your mind. I say this so you can prevail through hard times.                                                                                                                                      38.6 Know I Am the hope when the world is at war. I say this so you don’t forget me, ignore.

In revelation 38.1, The Real God instructs us to semantically interpret the phrase “I Am” when used with an upper case “I” and uppercase “Am” in a way that adds another extensional understanding layer to the traditional meaning of “I am” in lower case. The Real God provides a linguistic prescriptive rule — a definition that governs the interpretation of all uses of the phrase ‘I Am’. It is not a metaphor; it is a meta-level prescriptive instruction: a divine glossary entry.

38.1 I Am means Creator, the Giver, Sustainer. Like past, present, future, my gift, I’m the maker.

The Real God has done this by design as this creates a layered semantic expansion of  “I Am” where “I Am” maintains it’s standard English grammatical identity while also being enriched to extend the meaning (as per the prescriptive definition in 38.1) so that it cognitively reads as “I am the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of……..” 

With this in mind and adding the semantic layers for the prescriptive rule, the verse 38.2 will read as The Real God saying “I am the creator, giver and sustainer of the spirit in you and all life”.  When applied in context this makes The Real God the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of the subject matter and not the subject matter itself whether the subject matter is spirit, strength, drive, hope etc 

The revelations above when interpreted in their correct context makes it clear that any metaphors do not entail pantheism (God = everything) or panentheism (God in everything), which would contradict the strict monotheistic transcendence asserted in 36.1 and 62.2.

36.1 No image, no idol, no form can describe. I’m likened to none as I’m one of a kind.                  62.1 I accept the truth, truth of my Creator.
The one above all, whose mercy is greatest.
62.2 The one that is formless, the one that saves all. I pledge my allegiance by my will alone.

Furthermore, the verse 38.2 ends with a moral imperative — “so you know to treat others right” — confirming that the function of the verse is ethical, not metaphysical. To claim literal spiritual indwelling would contradict foundational doctrines of divine formlessness (62.2) and non-likeness (36.1), and commit a category error by confusing poetic attribution with ontological presence. Thus, the apologetic claim is internally inconsistent and logically unsound.

The same logical application of the divine title “I Am” should be applied accross all the “I Am” verses in The Infallible Kiran such as those below:

1.5 I Am the past, the present, and the future, but in neither do I reside.                                          Note: In context this cognitively reads as The Real God saying “I am the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of the past the present and the future but in neither do I reside.

1.12 I Am the eternal guiding spirit inside all my children.                                                                Note: In context this cognitively reads as The Real God saying “I am the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of the eternal guiding spirit inside all my children.

1.13 I Am the eternal guiding light that shines deep in your heart.                                               Note: In context this cognitively reads as The Real God saying “I am the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of the eternal guiding light that shines deep in your heart.

1.14 I Am the eternal guiding consciousness that lives deep in your soul.                                      Note: In context this cognitively reads as The Real God saying “I am the Creator, Giver and Sustainer of the the eternal guiding consciousness that lives deep in your soul.

The Real God speaks in this way—not to dissolve the line between Creator and creation—but to anchor the heart in remembrance. Each phrase, “I Am the spirit in you,” “I Am the strength in your mind,” “I Am the hope in a world at war,” is not a metaphysical claim that The Real God is literally these created things, but a call to see The Real God’s touch behind every noble impulse, every sacred connection, and every breath of goodness.

Where pantheists see God in everything and so treat all things with reverence, The Real God evokes that same reverence—but without collapsing into confusion. The Real God is not the tree, nor the wind, nor the spirit within you. But God is the Creator, Giver, Sustainer, and ultimate Source of all that is life-giving, luminous, and loving within them. You feel the sacred, because what you are touching is a gift from the The Real God.

This creates a spiritual bond so strong that you begin to see The Real God in every moment of mercy, behind every act of courage, and within every light that guides you—not because The Real God is those things, but because they come from The Real God, point to The Real God, and call you back to The Real God.

So when The Real God says, “I Am the eternal guiding light that shines deep in your heart,” it is not a claim of identity but of intimacy. You are not The Real God, and The Real God is not you. But the bridge between you is so lovingly built, that when you walk in light, you walk in remembrance. When you speak with justice, you echo the voice of the Most Just. When you show compassion, you reflect the Most Compassionate. An analogy for this is like light from the sun warming a person without the sun being in them. 

Thus, the emotional power people derive of pantheism—its reverence for all—is preserved. But it is grounded not in confusion, but in clarity: a transcendent Creator who is near not by being inside all things, but by creating, giving and sustaining all things in love. 

False Claim 3: In revelation 1.8 The Real God claims to be eternally merciful but in revelation 55.10 punishes people on Judgement Day for sins committed in their human life which contradicts eternal mercy.

Rebuttal by Prophet Gavin:
The claim that The Real God is not eternally merciful due to corrective punishment on Judgement Day is objectively false and philosophically incoherent when examined within the internal textual framework of The Infallible Kiran as outlined below.

1.8 I am the eternally loving and eternally merciful to all I gave life.

23.2 All sins of your life, I’ll forgive you in time. 
My mercy’s eternal, I promise you child.
23.3 Take comfort my child, as all reach paradise. But not before you’ve been judged, cleansed from inside

55.10 You’ll pay for your sins, yes you’ll pay for your crimes. You’ll learn right from wrong, I will teach you my child.
55.11 Until from your free will, you’re sinless inside. Know when you are sinless, my Heaven you’ll find.

Firstly all reach paradise eventually after reform as evidenced by revelation 23.2 where The Real God says “Take comfort my child, as all reach paradise.” This evidences The Real God’s eternally merciful nature as all are eventually saved without exception. Those who die as sinners must be reformed before entering heaven as The Real God says in revelation 55.11 that only the sinless enter heaven and this must be based on your own free will. The Real God says in 55.10 “You’ll learn right from wrong, I will teach you my child.” so all humans will be taught by The Real God through a correction reformation process. Part of the reformation process is living through the crimes you committed, but this time through the mind of your victim so you can truly understand the severity and implications of your actions before death. Punishment is not vengeance based but part of reformation. If The Real God just forgives without educating the subject, this would show a lack of justice as the sinner would not have understood the severity of their actions and would likely do the same in heaven hence why only the sinless enter heaven. Punishment here is synonymous with experiential learning, not suffering for its own sake. Instantaneous forgiveness without transformation is morally meaningless and would violate justice. If any suffering is (a) measured, (b) educational, and (c) leads to eternal salvation, then it enhances the definition of mercy — it rescues the soul fully and forever, which is a greater mercy than mere pardon. Punishment is purely a corrective experience.

Instantaneous forgiveness is incoherent in view of mercy. Mercy must balance with moral integrity, else it becomes amoral permissiveness which is no mercy at all. Also if The Real God punished for eternity with no chance of redemption this would be unjust and show a complete lack of mercy. As The Real God is all knowing so The Real God knows exactly what is required to reform anyone. The Real God by necessity is the greatest of all teaches so nobody is beyond the reach of salvation and due to omniscience The Real God knows exactly how to reform anyone. The Real God is the saviour of all without exception.

The Real God is also omni-benevolent so most good and perfectly moral. Someone who is objectively most merciful, most good, and the greatest of all teaches by necessity must save all. If being were created beyond the reach of The Real God then their test is logically flawed as there is no way of passing. Due to these points The Real God is eternally merciful without compromising being most just and facilitating reform even if part of the reformation process involves just reforming punishment.